TBDB
WORLD Sign In Sign Out
Feedback

Samples and Conditions with significant expression of RV1498A : conserved hypothetical protein

Hide/Show Experimental Conditions

Click on an area of interest to select experiments. Drag to expand selection area.

Histogram x-axis:

check all - uncheck all - check all positive - check all negative - Reset Display
P-Value for Experimental Condition: <=1e-10 1e-10 to 1e-8 1e-8 to 1e-6 1e-6 to 1e-4 1e-4 to 1e-2 >0.01

raw pcl GP cluster Download Table

Sample Name Experimental
Condition
Expression Value Intensity Significance Publication
H37Rv hypoxia 4hr rep 1Hypoxia-0.569.870.35Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4hr rep 2Hypoxia-0.3110.100.17Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4hr rep 4Hypoxia0.7110.910.58Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4hr rep 5Hypoxia-0.3711.130.82Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4hr rep 6Hypoxia0.1510.330.19Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 8hr rep 1Hypoxia-1.378.710.81Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 8hr rep 2Hypoxia-1.458.030.70Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 12hr rep 1Hypoxia-1.658.630.82Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 12hr rep 2Hypoxia-1.478.080.83Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 1 day rep 2Hypoxia-1.988.590.91Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 1 day rep 3Hypoxia-0.959.030.50Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 1 day rep 5Hypoxia1.6210.911.33Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 1 day rep 6Hypoxia0.979.660.54Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 1 day rep 7Hypoxia1.4111.811.35Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 1 day rep 9Hypoxia-0.549.880.40Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4 day rep 2Hypoxia-0.0012.810.12Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4 day rep 4Hypoxia0.8211.080.74Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4 day rep 5Hypoxia1.6211.460.93Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4 day rep 6Hypoxia1.2711.300.91Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4 day rep 7Hypoxia-1.617.790.83Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 7 day rep 1Hypoxia-2.097.930.72Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 7 day rep 5Hypoxia1.6211.151.05Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 7 day rep 6Hypoxia0.259.750.06Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 7 day rep 7Hypoxia1.3911.820.99Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 4hr rep 1Hypoxia-1.429.290.65Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 4hr rep 2Hypoxia-0.779.570.61Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 4hr rep 4Hypoxia-0.479.780.35Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 4hr rep 5Hypoxia-1.378.791.16Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 8hr rep 3Hypoxia-1.599.731.06Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 12hr rep 1Hypoxia-1.158.810.74Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 12hr rep 4Hypoxia-1.568.371.08Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 1 day rep 1Hypoxia-1.249.660.86Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 1 day rep 2Hypoxia-0.8810.350.63Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 1 day rep 3Hypoxia-0.6810.400.53Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 1 day rep 4Hypoxia0.768.420.46Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 1 day rep 6Hypoxia-1.269.430.82Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 4 day rep 1Hypoxia-1.198.870.53Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 7 day rep 1Hypoxia-0.1511.850.28Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 8hr rep 2Hypoxia-1.938.761.22Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 12hr rep 3Hypoxia-1.997.601.04Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37dosR mutant hypoxia 1 day rep 5Hypoxia-1.198.480.69Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4hr rep 3Hypoxia-0.6610.150.63Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4hr rep 7Hypoxia-1.618.581.26Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 8hr rep 3Hypoxia-1.487.550.84Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 12hr rep 3Hypoxia-2.048.251.14Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 1 day rep 4Hypoxia-0.629.600.64Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 1 day rep 10Hypoxia-1.937.920.95Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4 day rep 1Hypoxia-1.977.920.78Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 7 day rep 4Hypoxia0.8210.650.29Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 7 day rep 3Hypoxia-2.027.360.84Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 7 day rep 2Hypoxia-2.448.041.04Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv hypoxia 4 day rep 3Hypoxia-0.0610.100.17Rustad TR, et al. (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 1Control cDNA vs gDNA-1.936.880.59Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 2Control cDNA vs gDNA-1.806.480.67Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 3Control cDNA vs gDNA-1.986.720.57Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 1Control cDNA vs gDNA2.1410.360.70Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 2Control cDNA vs gDNA2.2510.130.54Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 3Control cDNA vs gDNA1.6210.370.44Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 27 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 1Strain comparison-1.897.060.63Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 27 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 2Strain comparison-3.107.111.07Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 27 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 1Strain comparison1.7710.170.59Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 27 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 2Strain comparison2.098.970.68Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 1Strain comparison-1.147.500.35Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 2Strain comparison-1.687.370.69Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 1Strain comparison4.4710.261.67Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 2Strain comparison2.8510.930.92Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 3Strain comparison2.2710.330.53Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 1Strain comparison-1.926.760.68Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 2Strain comparison-2.367.660.91Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 3Strain comparison-3.116.070.75Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 1Strain comparison3.159.960.69Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 2Strain comparison3.389.551.01Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 3Strain comparison2.389.460.66Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv wild type Cy3 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy5 rep 1Wild type vs Mutant-0.218.270.11Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy3 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy5 rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.2510.310.45Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy3 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy5 rep 3Wild type vs Mutant0.798.330.75Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy5 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy3 (DS) rep 1Wild type vs Mutant0.369.590.69Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy5 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy3 (DS) rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.579.280.96Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy5 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy3 (DS) rep 3Wild type vs Mutant0.068.440.15Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type vs PepD null mutant rep 1Wild type vs Mutant0.479.350.73White MJ, et al. (2010)
H37Rv wild type vs PepD null mutant (DS) rep 1Wild type vs Mutant0.438.820.58White MJ, et al. (2010)
H37Rv wild type vs PepD null mutant rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.179.210.20White MJ, et al. (2010)
H37Rv wild type vs PepD null mutant (DS) rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.158.480.34White MJ, et al. (2010)
H37Rv wild type vs PepD null mutant rep 3Wild type vs Mutant0.1310.420.22White MJ, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 1hrs rep 5Reaeration0.959.060.89Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 1hrs rep 6Reaeration-0.177.880.34Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 1hrs rep 7Reaeration-1.946.681.74Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 1hrs rep 8Reaeration-0.807.200.88Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 4hrs rep 5Reaeration0.478.400.37Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 4hrs rep 6Reaeration-0.248.300.19Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 4hrs rep 7Reaeration-1.557.131.35Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 4hrs rep 8Reaeration-0.857.360.88Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 24hrs rep 5Reaeration-0.388.660.31Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 24hrs rep 6Reaeration-0.209.130.24Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 6hrs rep 1Reaeration-0.383.200.26Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 6hrs rep 2Reaeration-1.053.730.50Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 6hrs rep 3Reaeration-0.183.620.06Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 6hrs rep 5Reaeration-0.686.550.48Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 12hrs rep 1Reaeration-0.996.530.69Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 12hrs rep 2Reaeration0.076.440.06Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 12hrs rep 3Reaeration-1.391.660.12Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 12hrs rep 4Reaeration0.616.030.35Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 12hrs rep 5Reaeration-0.676.400.46Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 12hrs rep 6Reaeration0.975.940.15Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 24hrs rep 1Reaeration0.329.980.28Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 24hrs rep 2Reaeration-0.7710.140.55Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 24hrs rep 3Reaeration-0.705.460.45Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv reaeration for 24hrs rep 4Reaeration1.256.110.76Sherrid AM, et al. (2010)
H37Rv maltose-1-phosphate stress stimulon rep 2Null mutant vs complemented null mutant0.118.310.15Kalscheuer R, et al. (2010)
H37Rv maltose-1-phosphate stress stimulon rep 3Null mutant vs complemented null mutant-0.177.060.14Kalscheuer R, et al. (2010)
H37Rv maltose-1-phosphate stress stimulon rep 1Null mutant vs complemented null mutant-0.467.740.14Kalscheuer R, et al. (2010)
CDC1551 nadABC null nicotinamide starvation rep 3Nicotinamide4.336.691.97Vilcheze C, et al. (2010)
M. bovis nadABC null nicotinamide starvation rep 3Nicotinamide-0.206.570.14Vilcheze C, et al. (2010)
CDC1551 nadABC null nicotinamide starvation rep 2Nicotinamide-2.245.200.48Vilcheze C, et al. (2010)