TBDB
WORLD Sign In Sign Out
Feedback

Samples and Conditions with significant expression of RV0999A

Hide/Show Experimental Conditions

Click on an area of interest to select experiments. Drag to expand selection area.

Histogram x-axis:

check all - uncheck all - check all positive - check all negative - Reset Display
P-Value for Experimental Condition: <=1e-10 1e-10 to 1e-8 1e-8 to 1e-6 1e-6 to 1e-4 1e-4 to 1e-2 >0.01

raw pcl GP cluster Download Table

Sample Name Experimental
Condition
Expression Value Intensity Significance Publication
BCG wild type vs BCG with empty pMV361 at OD 0.2 rep 1Control-0.128.250.44Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with empty pMV361 at OD 0.2 rep 2Control0.068.610.24Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with empty pMV361 at OD 0.2 rep 3Control-0.358.441.39Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.2 rep 1Wild type vs overexpression-0.027.510.09Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.2 rep 2Wild type vs overexpression0.117.170.17Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.2 rep 3Wild type vs overexpression-0.157.490.34Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with empty pMV361 at OD 0.2 rep 4Control-0.076.800.27Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.2 rep 4Wild type vs overexpression-0.245.820.52Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.2 rep 5Wild type vs overexpression-0.046.630.14Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with empty pMV361 at OD 0.4 rep 1Control0.048.140.18Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with empty pMV361 at OD 0.4 rep 2Control0.056.510.20Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with empty pMV361 at OD 0.4 rep 3Control-0.015.280.03Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with empty pMV361 at OD 0.4 rep 4Control0.006.860.01Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with empty pMV361 at OD 0.4 rep 5Control-0.017.220.08Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.4 rep 1Wild type vs overexpression-0.216.790.40Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.4 rep 2Wild type vs overexpression-0.286.710.58Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.4 rep 3Wild type vs overexpression-0.167.090.46Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
BCG wild type vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.4 rep 4Wild type vs overexpression2.361.161.75Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 0.3-1Oligopeptide permease deficient0.026.150.12Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 0.3-2Oligopeptide permease deficient0.424.500.76Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-1Oligopeptide permease deficient0.004.320.01Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-2Oligopeptide permease deficient0.425.050.80Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.5-1Oligopeptide permease deficient0.166.560.38Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.5-2Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.106.220.36Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 0.3-3Oligopeptide permease deficient1.783.060.69Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 0.3-4Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.013.750.08Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-3Oligopeptide permease deficient0.215.720.48Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-4Oligopeptide permease deficient0.125.630.26Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.5-3Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.225.630.61Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.5-4Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.595.400.88Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-5Oligopeptide permease deficient0.035.050.11Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-6Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.325.670.69Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 Opp KO complemented vs Opp KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-1Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.175.830.50Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 Opp KO complemented vs Opp KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-2Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.015.920.04Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 Opp KO complemented vs Opp KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-3Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.316.110.94Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 Opp KO complemented vs Opp KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.0-4Oligopeptide permease deficient0.284.240.05Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC, OD 1.5-6Oligopeptide permease deficient0.016.440.01Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD 0.3-1Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.105.640.30Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD 0.3-2Oligopeptide permease deficient0.035.880.06Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD1-1Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.135.780.78Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD1-2Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.106.030.40Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD1.5-1Oligopeptide permease deficient0.134.970.26Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD1.5-2Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.036.150.23Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD 0.3-3Oligopeptide permease deficient0.145.890.32Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD 0.3-4Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.036.590.07Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD1-3Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.236.180.80Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD1-4Oligopeptide permease deficient0.146.490.40Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD1.5-3Oligopeptide permease deficient0.016.740.03Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
MTB1254 WT vs Rv3662c-3665c KO in 7H9OADC-Exp2, OD1.5-4Oligopeptide permease deficient-0.036.750.17Flores-Valdez MA, et al. (2009)
H37Rv dosR KO vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.4 rep 1Null mutant vs overexpression0.136.700.19Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
H37Rv dosR KO vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.4 rep 2Null mutant vs overexpression0.186.350.30Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
H37Rv dosR KO vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.4 rep 3Null mutant vs overexpression0.335.970.40Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
H37Rv dosR KO vs BCG with pMFdosR at OD 0.4 rep 4Null mutant vs overexpression0.366.900.42Flores Valdez MA and Schoolnik GK (2010)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 1Wild type vs Mutant1.244.631.15Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.015.970.01Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 3Wild type vs Mutant0.235.350.13Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 1Wild type vs Mutant1.195.181.21Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 2Wild type vs Mutant0.125.980.07Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 3Wild type vs Mutant-0.395.660.54Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 1Wild type vs Mutant-4.373.472.34Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 2Wild type vs Mutant0.174.730.07Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 3Wild type vs Mutant-2.864.301.52Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null dosT complemented rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 1Wild type vs Mutant1.706.471.61Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null dosT complemented rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-1.826.031.73Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null dosT complemented rapid anaerobic dormancy day 6 rep 3Wild type vs Mutant0.095.420.00Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null anaerobic Gaspak 4hr rep 1Wild type vs Mutant-0.957.401.17Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null anaerobic Gaspak 4hr rep 2Wild type vs Mutant0.227.200.28Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null anaerobic Gaspak 4hr rep 3Wild type vs Mutant0.093.460.07Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null anaerobic Gaspak 4hr rep 1Wild type vs Mutant-0.816.590.69Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null anaerobic Gaspak 4hr rep 2Wild type vs Mutant0.745.870.80Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null anaerobic Gaspak 4hr rep 1Wild type vs Mutant-2.146.081.29Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null anaerobic Gaspak 4hr rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-4.205.531.93Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null anaerobic Gaspak 4hr rep 3Wild type vs Mutant-3.986.271.67Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null anaerobic Gaspak24hr rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.065.610.20Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null anaerobic Gaspak24hr rep 3Wild type vs Mutant1.282.831.00Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null anaerobic Gaspak 24hr rep 2Wild type vs Mutant0.436.240.36Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null anaerobic Gaspak 24hr rep 3Wild type vs Mutant-3.262.451.68Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null anaerobic Gaspak24hr rep 1Wild type vs Mutant-0.286.750.12Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null anaerobic Gaspak24hr rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.396.080.43Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS/dosT null anaerobic Gaspak24hr rep 3Wild type vs Mutant-1.005.780.83Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null nitric oxide treatment 1hr rep 1Wild type vs Mutant0.584.850.34Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null nitric oxide treatment 1hr rep 2Wild type vs Mutant0.066.640.06Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null nitric oxide treatment 1hr rep 3Wild type vs Mutant1.566.651.76Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosS null nitric oxide treatment 1hr rep 4Wild type vs Mutant0.485.590.67Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null nitric oxide treatment 1hr rep 1Wild type vs Mutant-0.874.480.91Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null nitric oxide treatment 1hr rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.313.700.36Honaker RW, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wt vs dosT null nitric oxide treatment 1hr rep 3Wild type vs Mutant0.984.880.82Honaker RW, et al. (2009)