TBDB
WORLD Sign In Sign Out
Feedback

Samples and Conditions with significant expression of RV0724A : conserved hypothetical protein

Hide/Show Experimental Conditions

Click on an area of interest to select experiments. Drag to expand selection area.

Histogram x-axis:

check all - uncheck all - check all positive - check all negative - Reset Display
P-Value for Experimental Condition: <=1e-10 1e-10 to 1e-8 1e-8 to 1e-6 1e-6 to 1e-4 1e-4 to 1e-2 >0.01

raw pcl GP cluster Download Table

Sample Name Experimental
Condition
Expression Value Intensity Significance Publication
H37Rv cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 1Control cDNA vs gDNA2.167.871.10Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 2Control cDNA vs gDNA1.857.140.98Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 3Control cDNA vs gDNA1.937.311.19Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 1Control cDNA vs gDNA-1.679.750.88Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 2Control cDNA vs gDNA-1.849.231.07Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 3Control cDNA vs gDNA-1.929.941.02Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 27 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 1Strain comparison2.117.731.12Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 27 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 2Strain comparison2.117.620.98Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 27 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 1Strain comparison-1.6410.340.89Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 27 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 2Strain comparison-1.959.121.11Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 1Strain comparison1.747.550.88Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 2Strain comparison1.747.900.97Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 1Strain comparison-1.769.801.09Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 2Strain comparison-1.949.710.81Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 32 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 3Strain comparison-1.909.130.81Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 1Strain comparison2.057.210.87Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 2Strain comparison1.797.990.69Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy3 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy5 (DS) rep 3Strain comparison0.195.990.18Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 1Strain comparison-1.799.101.11Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 2Strain comparison-0.498.940.12Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
Strain 49 cDNA Cy5 vs H37Rv gDNA Cy3 rep 3Strain comparison-2.248.410.23Andreu N and Gibert I (2008)
H37Rv wild type Cy3 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy5 rep 1Wild type vs Mutant-0.088.870.12Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy3 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy5 rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.389.400.20Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy3 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy5 rep 3Wild type vs Mutant-0.178.330.02Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy5 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy3 (DS) rep 1Wild type vs Mutant-0.069.670.14Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy5 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy3 (DS) rep 2Wild type vs Mutant-0.029.390.07Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)
H37Rv wild type Cy5 vs Rv0485 Tn mutant Cy3 (DS) rep 3Wild type vs Mutant0.258.210.31Goldstone RM, et al. (2009)